[OTTO (-[before 1016]). The Gesta Abbatem Trudonensium names "Lutgarde filia Hermegardis Namurcensis comitissæ" as wife of "Ottonis comitis de Los"[765]. No other reference to this Comte Otto has been found. Otto and his wife are not shown in Europäische Stammtafeln[766]. From a chronological point of view, an additional generation between Rudolf (967) and Giselbert ([1044/46]) would not be surprising. If Otto did exist, and was the father of the sons shown below, he would have died before 1016, the date of the charter in which they are named (see below). The name Otto appears in later generations of the Looz family, which gives some credence to its being the name of an earlier ancestor. [According to Mantelius, the father of Giselbert and Baldric [III] Bishop of Liège was "Ludovicus de Los Rudolfi comitis secundo genitus" (no primary source cited)[767]. No trace of this person has been found in the primary sources so far consulted in the preparation of the present document.] m ---. The name of Otto´s wife is not known. [The Gesta Abbatem Trudonensium names "Lutgarde filia Hermegardis Namurcensis comitissæ" as wife of "Ottonis comitis de Los" and the couple as parents of "Baldricus secundus"[768]. If this is correct, Otto´s wife was Liutgarde de Namur, daughter of Albert [I] Comte de Namur & his wife Ermengardis of Lower Lotharingia [Carolingian]. However, it appears chronologically impossible for a daughter of Comte Albert [I] (whose marriage is dated to 990) to have been the mother of Baldric [III] Bishop of Liège (installed as bishop in 1008). Anothervariation is provided by the Vita Arnulfi which names "Lugerdam, Godam, Ermengardam" as the three sisters of "Albertus comes Namurcensis", and adds that Liutgarde was the mother of "Emmonem et Ottonem fratrem eius", although without naming Liutgarde´s husband[769]. From a chronological point of view, this version is more coherent but, if correct, Liutgarde´s husband would have been Giselbert not Otto.] [Otto] & his wife had three children